Anyone who is silly enough to think they "own" their body's
parts (uteri included) has never tried to publicly sell such parts.

I suppose it's only a matter of time until the Supreme Court orders
women to have babies so they can be adopted by gay couples.
(the second sentence was a joke)

-Bob

Since I'm in a serious mood at the moment, I shall admit
that I'm in agreement with Gagdad Bob who put it this way:
"Make no mistake, either a human life is infinitely precious or it is worthless. You can pretend that there is some middle ground, but you are simply pretending and you know it, you rascal."

Last November my daughter-in-law had acute liver failure
when she was five months pregnant. Her baby (a 22 week
fetus) was delivered alive by C-section only to die while she was still getting her liver transplant.

I held the baby while she was alive. Although small, she appeared perfectly developed. Another two weeks of gestation and perhaps she would have survived.

So, what exactly is "late term abortion"?
I think you know.
Either a human life is infinitely precious or it is worthless.
-Bob

SCOTUS upheld the 1993 Congresional ban on partial-birth abortions.

Intact dilation and extraction, or D&X or ID&X--AKA "Partial-birth abortions" From Wikipedia:

"Preliminary procedures are performed over a period of two to three days, to gradually dilate the cervix using laminaria tents (sticks of seaweed which absorb fluid and swell). Sometimes drugs such as synthetic pitocin are used to induce labor. Once the cervix is sufficiently dilated, the doctor uses an ultrasound and forceps to grasp the fetus' leg. The fetus is turned to a breech position, if necessary, and the doctor pulls one or both legs out of the birth canal, causing what is referred to by some people as the 'partial birth' of the fetus. The doctor subsequently extracts the rest of the fetus, usually without the aid of forceps, leaving only the head still inside the birth canal. An incision is made at the base of the skull and a suction catheter is inserted into the cut. The brain tissue is removed, which causes the skull to collapse and allows the fetus to pass more easily through the birth canal. The placenta is removed and the uterine wall is vacuum aspirated using a suction curette...Ron Fitzsimmons, executive director of the National Coalition of Abortion Providers (a trade association of abortion providers), told the New York Times (Feb. 26, 1997): "In the vast majority of cases, the procedure is performed on a healthy mother with a healthy fetus that is 20 weeks or more along." Some prominent pro-choice advocates quickly defended(er,refuted???) the accuracy of Fitzsimmons' statements. Pro-life organizations opposed to the method have asserted that in the vast majority of cases, neither the mother nor the fetus suffers from any substantial medical disorder."

I for one am getting tired of hearing people say that the Supreme Court has banned the procedure. They did no such thing. It was illegal before they made their ruling, and it remains so.

Just for the record, how many people can have their hands on a woman's uterus at the same time? What if there's a concurring opinion?

Cuz--

It's the ENTIRE PATRIARCHY. Which Ginsberg is PART OF. Because she WEARS A ROBE. Don't you know ANYTHING?

Even the dissenters are GUILTY AS HELL. Because if they really cared about women's rights, they'd have SHOT THE OFFENDING JUSTICES.