The 2000-2005 Saturn L-Series offered a dohc, 24 valve V6 (3.0L)/183(cu.in.) engine that produced 182 hp and 190 pound-feet of torque(@5600 rpm). The curb weight of the sedan was 2910 lbs.

2002 Chrysler PT Cruiser--

Base:dohc I4 2.4L /148(cu.in), 150hp, 162ft.lb torque.

Turbocharged dohc I4 2.4L /148(cu.in.) 220hp, 245ft.lb torque.

But mine isn't the turbo. I mean, it would say it was if it were. And it would be on the bill of sale if it were a turbo. I think.

So why do I feel that it's every bit as powerful as the husband's LS? Does it have to do with that distinction of which engines are "peaky" and which are not?

Very mysterious. I swear, I'm almost willing to learn the physics of engines to explain it.

I wonder whether it's the fact that it's so high off the gound, which leads my mind to overcompensate for this vs. the low-riding Saturn.

No "2.4 Turbo" on the tach faceplate? You'll find the turbo connected to the exhaust manifold(the place below the spark plugs where the exhaust gases leave the engine on the way to the catalytic converter and the muffler), which should be visible with the hood open. It'll look something like a half of a 2 pound coffee can. See it?

You are not imagining things. There is speed, and there is the perception of speed. Sometimes it's as simple as there being less noise insulation in a car. Weight is not a factor because the two cars are pretty close there. Whatever it is, enjoy it! You have it and that's all that matters. Be happy!

Nothing on the tachometer.I think I'm just a naive kid from a small town, who's impressed with all this "acceleration" business.