Yeah. Them guys!

Ann Coulter = media whore idiot. At least I tried to warn CPAC. Oh, you helped too, Attila. Thanks.

Yeah, well. I may not be a big Ann fan, but I think there are reasons to believe "Hildebeast" would prosecute the war on terror more vigorously than McCain--they both like to run counter to expectations. And Hillary, as The First Female President, might feel she had a lot to prove.

I don't think Hillary can damage the country as much as McCain can. The Repubs on the Hill will end up in the weird position of objecting to McCain's legislative initiatives, even if he's nominally from the same party. For a lot of what McCain wants to do, the Dem's will line up behind him.

I don't think the Repubs have the testicular fortitude necessary to stand against his bad ideas. Expect to see McCain-Kennedy resurrected from the dustbin of history.

Hillary will be like Bill before here - she'll be ignored by Democrat majorities on the Hill, and have to partner with the Repubs and then hope to peel off enough Dems to get her agenda thru. There will be a limitation on what she can do. And if she does go too far, she'll end up with Repub majorities in the House and maybe the Senate in two years.

I will not vote for nor endorse or campaign for the Hildabeest. But if Johnny Rotten is the alternative, I'd rather see a Republican Congress and the Hildebeest at the presidential helm. At least the Repubs will be inclined to oppose her more vigorously than they would Mr. Rotten.

As an example, you notice how Mr. "I never saw a piece of legislation I wanted to veto" has started vetoing stuff with the Dem's in charge of Congress? Recall how little Clinton I was able to get done in the 90's?

Gridlock = good!

And Hillary, as The First Female President, might feel she had a lot to prove.

yeah right and the rest. She would govern as a Republican. All that you are scared of now you would wake up in Hillaryville and say "Well thats OK then".

Hillary Clinton is a Republican.

"Hillary Clinton is a Republican"

Hillary was a budding Leninist, Menshevik, Bolshevik, Trotskyite ... What really mattered to Lenin - and what Saul Alinsky taught Hillary to value - was power.
Barbara Olsen, quoted in http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/01/hillarys_oedipal_problem.html

Tune out the Media for a moment and vote for Mitt Romney whenever you get the chance and we won't have to worry about McCain any more. Why are we letting the Left choose our candidate?

Oh, believe me: I adore Romney now. All the things that used to bother me about him make me starry-eyed at this point: bland?--no, no: he's staked out a consistent set of positions to which he will adhere! Unintellectual? No! He'll be a pragmatic leader! Mormon? Not really--just a representative of a fine, iconoclastic Western-states philosophy that promotes solid family values. Sexless? Heck, no!--just never fell out of love with his wife!

Hair too nice? Simply an accident of birth, no doubt.

Go, Mitt!

Hillary was a budding Leninist, Menshevik, Bolshevik, Trotskyite

And where are the Trotskyites now but the neocon wing of the Republican Party?