After fawning over Michelle Obama's (Mickey-O) designer wardrobe for the past nine months, with outfits--even separates-- going for $3-$4000/pop, the MSM has throw its considerable resources into investigating, or at least snarking about, Sarah Palin's $150K family wardrobe. I have noted that $150K is the exact amount
Eliot Laurence Spitzer spent on undressing women in 2007 alone. Maybe. Maybe not. The point is that they will never uncover the relevant interesting details about whether that total includes matching, coordinated, concealed-carry advanced weaponry.

The press had no interest into field trips from mental hospitals with Obama true-believers discerning the intent of patients by casting the actual votes. Something that was reported in the 2000 election in Cook and surrounding counties near Chicago when irate family members complained about the practice. To no avail.
Rules are meant to hang the opposition, like the rope we will eventually sell them. See Alinsky's book.

I don't see how you can compare the spending of money on a Democratic candidate's wife's wardrobe with the spending of money on a GOP running mate's wardrobe.

Dems are supposed to look glamorous; Republicans are supposed to look dowdy.

Also, we're supposed to work at a 5- or 6-to-one economic disadvantage.

Don't you know anything?

Just another example of media bias which has grown to immense proportions and has actually pushed Obama over Hillary and McCain to the White House. What is the solution? Are there not enough conservatives entering journalism or are they just not being hired..